• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Chernobyl Disaster Case Study Geography In Germany

Warnings against fresh milk held in the weeks following the accident

West German politicians went into an uproar against the Soviet Union, condemning its lax safety measures and the concealment of the potential threat of radiation. But the Soviet authorities maintained tight control of information in and around Chernobyl, only releasing sketchy details about the cause and extent of the accident.

Within less than two days, the wind changed and the radioactive cloud dropped poisoned rain on Bavaria. News coverage in West Germany turned to the danger of contamination for the German public. People in Bavaria were told to stay indoors as much as possible. The government issued warnings for German citizens to refrain from eating salads and forest mushrooms and drinking milk.

The young political party, the Greens, quickly staged protest rallies, carrying banners bearing the slogan "Chernobyl is everywhere." In television, politicians debated about the future of nuclear energy in West Germany. Nuclear power was no longer considered "safe energy."

" Cher n obyl n o da n ger for the GDR"

The Chernobyl disaster gave new wind to Germany's antinuclear movement

In East Germany, the state-controlled media remained loyal to its Soviet partners. The news broadcast Aktuelle Kamera issued the initial news statement about the meltdown simultaneously to the West German media. But it was called an "incident," not a complete meltdown. In the days that followed, the focus was on downplaying Chernobyl -- both in its extremity and in the potential danger for East German citizens. On the evening of May 1, a panel of nuclear scientists spoke on East German television.

"The East German experts tried to reassure people," said Hardy Graupner, a reporter for DW-RADIO's English service who worked for Radio Berlin International in East Berlin in 1986.

"But the information was contradictory. They said it was a Russian problem, that East Germany wasn't affected by contamination and that our nuclear power plants in Greifswald were of a younger generation, and therefore completely safe."

If anything, Graupner said, it gave East Germans the chance to look down on their big brother, the Soviet Union.

"The Chernobyl reactor that exploded was old," he said. "Experts said that the Soviets should have modernized it. The consensus was that East German technology was more sophisticated. They said that a nuclear meltdown could never happen in the GDR."

Clueless u n til 1990

East German newspapers also downplayed the explosion.

"Experts say: No danger from Chernobyl in East Germany," read the headlines in Saxony's newspaper, the Sächsische Zeitu n g, the next day.

Were the mushrooms in Turingia safer than in Bavaria?

"It was a two-column article on page six," Thomas Schade, an editor at the paper, told DW-WORLD.DE. "That was typical for the GDR -- the story didn't make the front page because that was full of coverage of the government's official May Day parades."

Saxony was one of the few regions in East Germany with little access to Western media.

"We were dependent on expert opinions," Schade said. "There weren't any official warnings about not eating fresh vegetables or drinking milk, and so in Saxony, we weren't very concerned. It wasn't until after the reunification in 1990 that we found out the real extent of the catastrophe."

Your browser is not secure

You're seeing this page because your web browser tried to connect to Warwick's website with insecure settings. Please upgrade your web browser.

The TLS 1.0 encryption protocol is disabled across the University's web services. Disabling TLS 1.0 prevents it from being used to access Warwick websites via an insecure web browser or application. We've made this change to keep the University's websites safe and secure.

What do I need to do?

When accessing websites using a web browser, ensure you use the latest available version of the browser – whether that is Internet Explorer, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari or another browser. Using the latest version keeps you safe online because you're using the most up-to-date security settings.

Why is this happening?

Although TLS 1.0, when configured properly, has no known security vulnerabilities, newer protocols are designed better to address the potential for new vulnerabilities.

The PCI Data Security Standard 3.1 recommends disabling “early TLS”:

“SSL and early TLS are not considered strong cryptography and cannot be used as a security control after June 30, 2016 [without a mitigation strategy for disabling it before June 2018].

[...]

The best response is to disable SSL entirely and migrate to a more modern encryption protocol, which at the time of publication is a minimum of TLS v1.1, although entities are strongly encouraged to consider TLS v1.2.”

We need to be PCI-compliant to take online payments at the University. It is not sufficient to merely disable TLS 1.0 on our transaction tracking system as the requirement extends to any system that initiates a payment, including car parking, printer credits, the Warwick website, etc.

One thought on “Chernobyl Disaster Case Study Geography In Germany

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *